نویسنده
دانشیار پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی، قم، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The report of Andalusian historians about Hamza Seyyed al-Shohada is different in different periods. This news has been influenced by historians until the fifth century, especially in the Umayyad era, and has not been fully reported. The question of this research is what role or effect the Umayyad rule had in reflecting these reports. To answer this question in a historical way and using historical sources and data analysis, it is hypothesized that in the works of Andalusian historians at this time a strange attempt has been made to hide the role of Hamza's killers and his position with the Prophet (PBUH). In such a way that some people, despite going into the details of the events of the beginning of Islam, refrain from referring to the news of Hamza and even the Uhud campaign, and some of them purposefully try to hide its main angles. In a way, India has ignored the role of Abu Sufyan's wife in killing Hamza, and some have only mentioned her mutilation, and some have referred to the mutilation of Muslims as a group.
کلیدواژهها [English]
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
)
